Suicidal insects: irregularities in their behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22201/cuaieed.16076079e.2021.22.3.8Keywords:
parasites, self-sacrifice, eusocial insects, autolysisAbstract
Suicide is not a behavior limited to human beings. Insects usually have a suicidal behavior similar to the one that occurs in some humans. Nevertheless, in insects are highly linked to needs such as reproduction, defense and in some specific cases parasitism. In this matter, there is great controversy because insects act by instinct and therefore on many cases it is not considered as suicide per se. However, that these animals act by instinct does not rule out that, from a practical point of view, we can consider this behavior as suicide.
References
Biron, D. G., Marché, L., Ponton, F., Loxdale, H. D., Galéotti, N., Renault, L. y Thomas, F. (2005). Behavioural manipulation in a grasshopper harbouring hairworm: a proteomics approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1577), 2117-2126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3213.
Dbenzhuser. (2016, 14 de agosto). Spinochordodes in Meconema. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spinochordodes_in_Meconema.jpg.
Eggert, A. K., y Sakaluk, S. K. (1994). Sexual cannibalism and its relation to male mating success in sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans (Haglidae: Orthoptera). Animal Behaviour, 47,(5) 1171-1177. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1994.1155.
Haydak, M. H. (1951). How long does a bee live after losing its sting? Glean. Bee Cult, 79, 85-86.
Hohorst, W., y Graefe, G. (1961). Ameisen—obligatorische Zwischenwirte des Lanzettegels (Dicrocoelium dendriticum). Naturwissenschaften, 48, 229-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00597502.
Hughes, D. P. (2015). Behavioral ecology: manipulative mutualism. Current Biology, 25(18), 806-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.067.
Joiner, T. E., Hom, M. A., Hagan, C. R., y Silva, C. (2016). Suicide as a derangement of the self-sacrificial aspect of eusociality. Psychological Review 123(3), 235-254. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000020.
Jones, T.H., Clark, D.A., Edwards, A.A., Davidson, D.W., Spande, T.F. y Snelling, R. R. (2004). The Chemistry of Exploding Ants, Camponotus spp. (Cylindricus complex). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 30, 1479-1492. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:joec.0000042063.01424.28.
Judge, K. [kjudge]. (2009, 16 de junio). Foto 12280736 [Cyphoderris strepitans]. https://www.naturalista.mx/photos/12280736.
Maxwell, M. R. (1998). Lifetime mating opportunities and male mating behaviour in sexually cannibalistic praying mantids. Animal Behaviour, 55(4), 1011-1028. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0671.
Pontoppidan, M. B., Himaman, W., Hywel-Jones, N. L., Boomsma, J. J., Hughes, D. P. (2009). Graveyards on the Move: The Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Dead Ophiocordyceps-Infected Ants. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e4835. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004835.
Shorter, J. R., y Rueppell, O. (2012). A review on self-destructive defense behaviors in social insects. Insectes Sociaux, 59, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0210-x.
Tawatao, N. (2009, 12 de junio). Camponotus saundersi casent0179025 profile 1 [fotografía]. https://cutt.ly/jcHlWfJ.
Wilson, E. O. (1971). The insect societies. Harvard University Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Digital Universitaria

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Revista Digital Universitaria es editada por la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional. Basada en una obra en http://revista.unam.mx/.